Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101441 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15537 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramji Kashyap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saraswati Yadav,Subhash Ghosh,Vinita Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Prajapati, Advocate holding brief of Sri V.P. Singh Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in F.I.R. No. 44 of 2025, Charge-sheet No. 01 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 B.N.S., Police Station Allahganj, District Shahjahanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the allegation against the applicant in the F.I.R. is that the applicant alongwith two co-accused persons were making forged Aadhar Card. He next added that the applicant has been falsely implicated due to political rivalry. He further contended that identically situated co-accused persons namely, Rituraj Kashyap and Ashish Kashyap have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.16766 of 2025 and 17877 of 2025 vide orders dated 23.06.2025 and 09.06.2025. He is seeking parity of the order aforesaid.He also added that there is no previous criminal antecedent of the applicant which has been mentioned in para 19 of the bail application. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 20.02.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail in absence of file but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Ramji Kashyap involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Ruhi H. Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad