Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5417 (RAJ)

RAJESH MALI S/O PARSADI MALI v. THE AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1636/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1636/2025 Rajesh Mali S/o Parsadi Mali, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 697, Tulsya Pura, Mahukalan, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur, Through Its Managing Director. 2. The Secretary (Admn.), Avvnl, Ajmer. 3. The Assistant Engineer (O And M), Avvnl, Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with a liberty to file a representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the facts and circumstances, relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court directs the respondent-Department that the representation filed by the petitioner (within fifteen days from the date of passing of this order) be decided in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order, pronto. The respondent-Department [2025:RJ-JP:4564] (2 of 2) [CW-1636/2025] will be at liberty to pass any further order(s) considering the administrative exigencies, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /181