SHRI. SAMEER S/O IQBAL NADAF v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)
WP/104829/2016 · 2025-03-20
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5417 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5417 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5147 WP No. 104829 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 104829 OF 2016 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI. SAMEER S/O IQBAL NADAF, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.74, SECTOR NO.5, SHREENAGAR, BELAGAVI.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.G.MULAWADMATH., SRI. S.S.KALLATTI., SRI. V.S.GADAD., SRI. M.H.PATIL AND SRI. HARSHAWARDHAN M.PATIL., ADVOCATES-ABSENT)
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), CITY CORPORATION, BELAGAVI.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARVIND.D.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5147 WP No. 104829 of 2016
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.03.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on
20.03.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 59