APHC010533542018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, THIRUVIDHI SATYA NARAYANA H. NO. 7 VELDURTHY (MANDAL) KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL 1. UNION OF INDIA, UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRY BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD MARG, NEW DELHI. NEWDELHI 2. THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ROC, 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NEAR CENTRAL WATRER BOARD, GST POST, BANDLAGUDA, NAGOLE, HY Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order of direction more particularly on nature of writ of Mandamus by calling for the records of Respondent No.2 pertaining to the Petitioner as disqualified Director in the website of the Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary, devoid of merit and to quash the list uploaded in the website of Respondent No.1 with regard to the Petitioner and consequently direct the Respondents herein to permit the Petitioner to continue him as Director of the Companies and/or get appoint or reappointed as Director of any Company without any interference a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25216/2018 VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, THIRUVIDHI SATYA NARAYANA H. NO. 7-62, VELDURTHY VILLAGE, VELDURTHY (MANDAL) KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND UNION OF INDIA, UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRY BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD MARG, NEW DELHI. NEWDELHI THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ROC, 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NEAR CENTRAL WATRER BOARD, GST POST, BANDLAGUDA, NAGOLE, HYDERABD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order of direction more particularly on nature of writ of Mandamus by calling for the records of Respondent No.2 pertaining to the Petitioner as disqualified Director in the website of the Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary, devoid of merit and to quash the list te of Respondent No.1 with regard to the Petitioner and consequently direct the Respondents herein to permit the Petitioner to continue him as Director of the Companies and/or get appoint or reappointed as Director of any Company without any interference and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3459] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, VAMSIDHAR THIRUVIDHI, THIRUVIDHI 62, VELDURTHY VILLAGE, VELDURTHY (MANDAL) KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH-518216 ...PETITIONER SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRY BHAVAN, DR. THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ROC, 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NEAR CENTRAL WATRER DERABD-500068 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order of direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by calling for the records of Respondent No.2 pertaining to the Petitioner as disqualified Director in the website of the Respondent No.1 as illegal, arbitrary, devoid of merit and to quash the list te of Respondent No.1 with regard to the Petitioner and consequently direct the Respondents herein to permit the Petitioner to continue him as Director of the Companies and/or get appoint or reappointed 2 W.P.No.25216 of 2018 JS,J IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the disqualification published by the respondents which was uploaded in the website of the Respondent No.1, by activating the DIN No. 03497202 and digital signature of the Petitioner, in so far as the Petitioner herein is concerned, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 3 W.P.No.25216 of 2018 JS,J The Court made the following ORDER: Ms.Vanga Anitha, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.11.2025 GRL 4 W.P.No.25216 of 2018 JS,J 126 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25216/2018 Dated: 22.11.2025 GRL