Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54164 (AP)

MACHHA BALAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11686/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010197012021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11686/2021 Between: 1. MACHHA BALAIAH, S/O. MACHHA CHINNA SUBBA RAIDU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, RIO. BESTAVEMULA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERTINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE PANCHYAT SECRETARY, BESTAVEMULA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE SHO, THALAMANCHIPATNAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. MACHHA RAJAKULLAAPPA, S/O PEDDA NARAYANA, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, AGRICULTURE, R/O. 2 BESTAVEMULA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents not taking action on the representation filed by the petitioner against the 6th Respondent causing obstruction to the public road and not allowing the petitioner to ingress and egress to his bullock cart and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents not taking action on the representation dated 02- 07-2020 filed by the petitioner against the 6th Respondent causing obstruction to the public road and not allowing the petitioner to ingress and aggress to his family and his bullock cart for the purpose of agricultural activities and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAMI MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. N ASHWANI KUMAR 4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3 THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11686 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents not taking action on the representation filed by the petitioner against the 6th Respondent causing obstruction to the public road and not allowing the petitioner to ingress and egress to his bullock cart.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that respondent No.6 informed that he will not create any inconvenience to the villagers by taking his bullock carts on that road. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated: 07.10.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11686 of 2021 Date: 07.10.2025 PSA