IRSHAD AHMED MALIK v. SHEIKH MUSHTAQ AHMED,SECY.G.A.D.AND ANR.
CPSW/43/2013 · 2025-02-10
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5416 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5416 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 43/2013 in SWP No. 1960/2011
Irshad Ahmed Malik
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Shivani Jalali, Advocate.
vs
Sheikh Mushtaq Ahmed, Secy. GAD and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 10.02.2025
1. Compliance report has been filed by the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt proceedings be closed.
3. Her statement is taken on record.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt proceedings are closed and the instant contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 10.02.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 57 Sahil Padha 2025.02.10 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document