CRWP-4591 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 Komal State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuan directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of not to allow respondent nos.4 to 6 to apprehends danger from them. 2. married with respondent no.4 Ankit Tiwari certificate and the photographs evidencing their marriage are attached as Annexure P- husband and wife, 20.04.2025. The petitioner tried to contact respondent no.4 (her husband) many times but someone else. It is further submitted tha are also continuously Thus, she apprehend 4591-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Jaswinder Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuan directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of allow respondent nos.4 to 6 to interfere in apprehends danger from them. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that married with respondent no.4 Ankit Tiwari certificate and the photographs evidencing their marriage are attached as -2 and P-3. They both lived with each other till 20.04.2025 as husband and wife, however, respondent no.4, all of a sudden, left her alone on 20.04.2025. The petitioner tried to contact respondent no.4 (her husband) but he used to extend threats to her someone else. It is further submitted that family members of respondent no.4 also continuously giving threats to the petitioner apprehends danger from respondent nos.4 to 6. The petitioner - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4591-2025 Decided on:06.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Bhardwaj , Advocate, filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & 3 for protection of her life and liberty and also interfere in her peaceful life as she Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was married with respondent no.4 Ankit Tiwari on 18.11.2024. The marriage certificate and the photographs evidencing their marriage are attached as 3. They both lived with each other till 20.04.2025 as however, respondent no.4, all of a sudden, left her alone on 20.04.2025. The petitioner tried to contact respondent no.4 (her husband) he used to extend threats to her and allegedly saying to marry family members of respondent no.4 the petitioner by making phone calls. danger from respondent nos.4 to 6. The petitioner has ...Petitioner ...Respondents filed the present petition under Article 226 of ce of also as she the petitioner was 18.11.2024. The marriage certificate and the photographs evidencing their marriage are attached as 3. They both lived with each other till 20.04.2025 as however, respondent no.4, all of a sudden, left her alone on 20.04.2025. The petitioner tried to contact respondent no.4 (her husband) and allegedly saying to marry family members of respondent no.4 by making phone calls. has VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.06 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4591 submitted a representation dated no.2. 3. 4. of the respondent 5. value of the document direction to respondent no.2 Nagar Mohali grant her protection, if any threat to 6. the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by May 06, 2025 vinod* 4591-2025 submitted a representation dated 30.04.2025 (Annexure P Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Nagar Mohali to decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to her life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - .04.2025 (Annexure P-4) to respondent Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary s placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District SAS to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner and e and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by her. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES pondent Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary s placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a SAS ) of the petitioner and It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to . VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.06 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document