ARUN @ARUN KUMAR AND ORS. v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
CRL.M.C./2785/2025 · 2025-05-21
Girish Kathpalia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54157 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54157 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 2785/2025
Page 1 of 2 pages $~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 21.05.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2785/2025 & CRL.M.A. 12478/2025
ARUN @ARUN KUMAR AND ORS.
.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mahendra Kumar and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Rupesh Raj, PS Bharat Nagar
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 110/2018 of PS Bharat Nagar, Delhi for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC. It is submitted that petitioners have compromised all disputes with the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2 herein). All three petitioners are present personally in court while respondent no. 2 has appeared through videoconferencing and all of them are identified by their respective counsel and IO/SI Rupesh Raj.
2. I have spoken with parties in Hindi.
GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.21 18:31:02 +05'30'
CRL.M.C. 2785/2025
Page 2 of 2 pages
3. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has settled all disputes with the petitioners and the marriage between the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 already stands dissolved by way of decree of divorce by mutual consent. Parties have decided that son of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 shall remain in custody of respondent no. 2 with no visitation rights granted to petitioners. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has received the complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and alimony and now no money is payable to her. Parties clearly understand that this settlement does not deal with rights of son of the parties. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to continue further prosecution of the petitioners. Detailed statements of parties were recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.
4. Having spoken with both sides, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial.
5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and accordingly FIR No. 110/2018 of PS Bharat Nagar, Delhi for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. Pending application stands
disposed of.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) MAY 21, 2025/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.05.21 18:30:46 +05'30'