Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54143 (KAR)

ALBERT DEEPAK v. JOSEPH PRASANNA KUMAR

RFA/2268/2023 · 2025-09-16

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37082-DB RFA No. 2268 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2268 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. ALBERT DEEPAK S/O RAJAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 2. SMT. MARIA DEEPA ABEL W/O ALBERT DEEPAK, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 3. SMT. URASALA RAJAN W/O RAJAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, ALL AT NO. 27, 2ND CROSS RAYAPPA ROAD, KAMMANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 084. 4. OASIS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA AN ALLEGED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, ALBERT DEEPAK AND MARIA DEEPA ABEL, NO.629, 1ST MAIN, DOMLUR, BANGALORE-560 071. 5. OASIS WEBSOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED A DULY REGISTERED COMPANY, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37082-DB RFA No. 2268 of 2023 NO.629, 1ST MAIN, DOMLUR, BANGALORE - 560 071. 6. SMT. FATHIMA SUSAINATHAN W/O MR. JAISON, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.40, LAXMI NILAYA, 2ND CROSS, SUTHAMA MAIN ROAD, RS PALYA, KAMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 033. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SAILESH S KATAREY.,ADVOCATE) AND: JOSEPH PRASANNA KUMAR S/O M. NAVIS, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.188, KARIYANAPALYA, 3RD CROSS, RAMACHANDRAPPA LAYOUT, ST. THOMAS TOWN PO., BANGALORE-560 084. …RESPONDENT THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2023 PASSED IN OS.NO.3404/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37082-DB RFA No. 2268 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no representation for the parties. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 03.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 19