Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5414 (HP)

SANT RAM v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/718/2025 · 2025-01-09

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.718 of 2025 Date of decision: 09.01.2025 Sant Ram. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “I That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue that the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued to the respondents to extend the benefit of Annexure P-4 to the petitioner by re- fixing the pay of the petitioner @ Rs.31200/- on completion of two years of regular service of petitioner alongwith all consequential benefits from due date in the interest of justice and fair play. II. That the respondent has directed to decide the representation of the petitioner with the time bound manner.” 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved and the relief prayed for by the petitioner has already been adjudicated Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and Others1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time-bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 9th January, 2025 Judge (Pardeep) 1CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024.