- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44593 MFA No. 348 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 348 OF 2016 (WC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MANJULA AGED ABOUAT 26 YEARS, W/O LATE PRAKASH 2. MEGHANA AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, D/O LATE PRAKASH SINCE MINOR REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER- APPELLANT NO.1 BOTH ARE R/O NO. 12, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, CAUVERINAGARA, KATRIGUPPE, BSK-II-STAGE, BENGALURU- 560 085 3. JAYARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O NANJUNDAPPA, R/O C.K. PURA, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 4. RUDRAMMA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O JAYARAMAPPA, R/O C.K. PURA, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44593 MFA No. 348 of 2016 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHIDAMBARA G S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAMESH NAIDU V AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O SUBBAIAH NAIDU, R/O NO. 30, 2ND CROSS, CHIKKALASANDRA, HANUMANTHANAGIRI, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 61 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD NO. 24, 1ST FLOOR, CLASS BUILDING, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU - 25 REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A M VENKATESH., ADVOCATE FOR R2; V/O DTD 5/3/2020 NOTICE TO R1 IS D/W) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.10.2015 PASSED IN E.C.A.NO.299/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXVIII ACMM, & CONCURRENT CHARGE OF SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, XXVI ACMM AND EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE (SCCH-09), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44593 MFA No. 348 of 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT The present appeal is filed to set aside the judgment and award dated 08.10.2015 in ECA No.299/2014, passed by the Court of Small Causes and XXVI ACMM and Employees Compensation Commissioner, Bangalore. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. It is submitted by learned counsels for the parties that already an appeal was filed for enhancement and amount awarded by the Tribunal was received by the appellants. 4. Submission is taken on record. 5. In view of the above submission, this MFA is Disposed of. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22