APHC010533622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 27621/2025 Between: 1. NADELLA VENKATARATNAM, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 72 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU P.S. PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. CHAVA RAMESH BABU, S/O LATE RAMA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS. RESIDENT OF ZPH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus leased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of 3rd respondent in taking appropriate action in pursuant to the petitioner representation, dated 19.09.2025 for providing police protection so as to implement the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.528 of 2008 on the file of Principal Senior Judge Court at Vijayawada for protection of decretal property in RS No. 117/1, of Agricultural Land of Kanuru village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, as illegal arbitrary, non- exercising the power vested with the office and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent 2 to 3 to provide police protection in respect of decreetal property in pursuant to the judgment and decree in O.S.528 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the petitioner’s representation, dt.19.09.2025 for providing police protection in respect of decreetal property in pursuant to the judgment and decree passed in O.S.528 of 2008, on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Vijayawada dt. 25.04.2025, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAMBOJU BALA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VAJJHALA SATYANARAYANA PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.27621 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide police protection in respect of the decretal property pursuant to the judgment and decree in O.S. 528 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Vijayawada. 2. Heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner; Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3; and Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned Designated Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the 4th respondent. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 08.10.2025, submitted that the 4th respondent filed CRP No. 1530 of 2024 before this Court, and an interim stay was granted on 25.07.2024, which is still pending. As the matter is purely civil in nature, the police did not interfere. Further, the 3rd respondent advised the petitioner to settle the matter before this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the matter is of civil in nature and that an interim stay was ordered by this Court in CRP No. 1530 of 2024 filed by the 4th respondent, police could not interfere in the matter. This Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner has to seek necessary directions for police protection in the above CRP, as stay was granted in that matter. Hence, this Writ Petition is liable to be closed without going into the merits of the case. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 23rd December, 2025 cbn 94 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 27621 of 2025 23rd December, 2025 cbn