APHC010102782017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 659 OF 2017 Between: 1. D.ESWAR, S/O. D.NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 27-8-1529, SUBASH NAGAR, MUDDIREDDIPALLI, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M. MADHAVAIAH, S/O. LATE M.NARAYANASWAMY, R/O. MUDDIREDDIPALLI, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order passed in Crl.MP.No. 07/2017 in Crl.A.No. 19/2017 dated 28-2-2017 on the file of the court of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District by allowing the Crl.RC. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1080 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the sentence and compensation amount of Rs.3,06,780/- 28-2-2017 in Crl.MP.No. 7/2017 in Crl.A.No. 19/2017 on the file of the court of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Hindupur on the same terms 2 and conditions imposed by the Special Magistrate, Hindupur in STC.No. 64/2013 dated 31-1-2017 pending disposal of the main Crl.Rc. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SAI VISHNU 2. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 28.02.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.07 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.19 of 2017 on the file of learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Hindupur. 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 28.02.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.07 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.19 of 2017. The Crl.M.P.No.07 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on him by the learned Special Magistrate, Hindupur dated 31.01.2017 passed in S.T.C.No.64 of 2013 for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Against the said orders, the petitioner/accused preferred the revision. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main Crl.A.No.19 of 2017 was disposed of on 29.01.2018. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said Crl.A.No.19 of 2017 was allowed on contest on 29.01.2018 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the Crl.A.No.19 of 2017 on 3 29.01.2018, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 29.10.2025 MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.659 of 2017 Date: 29.10.2025 MS