Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 541 (CHH)

ANIL KUMAR KUSHWAHA v. YUSUF KHAN

CRMP/3497/2025 · 2026-05-03

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 3497 of 2025 Anil Kumar Kushwaha, S/o Late Dharohar Prasad, aged about 56 years (Wrongly Mentioned As 50 In The Impugned Order), R/o Chandranagar Umarpoti, Post Utai, P.S. Utai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner Versus Yusuf Khan S/o M.Y. Khan Aged About 59 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As 53 In The Impugned Order), R/o Quarter No. 462/a, Zone-1, B.M.Y. Charoda, P.S. Grp, Bhilai- 3, District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Rohan Kumbhare, Advocate. For Respondent : Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate.. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 04 /05/2026 1. This application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS seeking extension of time in filing appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in light of judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Celestium Financial Vs. A.Ganasekaran reported in (2025) INSC 804 this Court disposed of Acq.A. No.791 of 2024 vide order dated 17.7.2025 with a direction to the appellant/complainant to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment/order dated 06.08.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg, District - Durg in Criminal Case Number RCC/7169/ 2016 before the concerned Sessions Judge within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant/complainant further submits that in compliance of the order dated 17.7.2025 passed in Acq.A. No.791 of 2024 an appeal has to be preferred before the Sessions Court, Durg, District - Durg, ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.12 10:29:33 +0530 -2- however, due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not prefer the appeal in 60 days. Thus, he submits that the period granted to the appellant/complainant to file the appeal may be extended. 4. Counsel for the respondent not opposed, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant. 5. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, further period of 30 days is granted from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the instant Cr.M.P. is disposed of. -Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge -/ Ashish