Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010339522023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 17442/2023 BETWEEN:
1. VAJRALA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O.KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/o. NUZIVEEDU BYPASS ROAD, OPP: HP PETROL PUMP, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE TAHASILDAR, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. BOMMAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.PONDUGALA ROAD, MYLAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the
2 action of the Respondent No.1 amending the revenue records in respect of the land extent Ac.0- 29 cents situated in Sy.No.128 of Mylavaram Village and Mandal, NTR District by deleting the name of the Petitioner and entering the name of the Respondent No.5 in the place of the name of the Petitioner without issuing notice in terms of Sec.5(3) of the AP Rights in Lands and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to restore the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records by removing the name of the Respondent No.5 in respect of the land extent Ac.0-29 cents situated in Sy.No.128 of Mylavaram Village and Mandal, NTR District in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. SK MEHABOOB NADEEM FAYAZ The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The respondent no.1-Tahsildar, Mylaram Mandal, mutated the name of unofficial respondent in the place of name of the petitioner without issuing any notice. The same was challenged in the present Writ Petition. Subsequent to filing of the Writ Petition, the name of the petitioner herein was restored by deleting the name of the unofficial respondent. Hence, the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 14.10.2025 Harin
4
46 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 17442 OF 2023
Date: 14-10-2025
Harin