IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 130 Puja Jasuja State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. list of Lecturer (Sociology) in Category (Annexure P considering the reservation meant for EWS Category as a horizo reservation. 2. the present petition, been submitted, however, the same ha thus, on instructions prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to dec State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus f Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Parvesh K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the meri Lecturer (Sociology) in General Category as well as the EWS Category (Annexure P-4) and action of the respondent considering the reservation meant for EWS Category as a horizo reservation. Learned counsel submit that rega the present petition, representation dated 02.04.2025 submitted, however, the same has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12915-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 07.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate, Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the merit General Category as well as the EWS 4) and action of the respondent-Department for considering the reservation meant for EWS Category as a horizontal Learned counsel submit that regarding the claim as raised in dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-11) has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions prays that a direction may be given to the ide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-12915-2025 -2- 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 02.04.2025 (Annexure P-11), within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 07.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.