Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54083 (KAR)

C NAGARAJU v. SMT LAKSHMI @ LAKSHMAMMA

RPFC/54/2019 · 2025-08-04

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30029 RPFC No. 54 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 54 OF 2019 BETWEEN: C NAGARAJU S/O CHANNGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT SATHAR SHIRANI BUILDING, GEDLAHALLI MAIN ROAD, UPPARAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR-572 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK J, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT LAKSHMI @ LAKSHMAMMA W/O C NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. LEELAVATHI D/O NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS RESPONDENTS NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/O SATHAR SHIRANI BUILDING, GEDLAHALLI MAIN ROAD, UPPARAHALLI TALUK TUMAKURU-572 102 AND ALSO R/AT C/O BORREGOWDA, JELLIPALYA, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK-572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DUSHYANTH ARADHYA H C, ADVOCATE FOR R1) R2 - LEELAVATHI SD) Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30029 RPFC No. 54 of 2019 THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984., PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 5TH JANUARY OF 2019 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.02/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.JUDGE, FAMILY COURT TUMKUR, THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This RPFC is of the year 2019. 2. On 13.02.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Again, on 11.09.2024, there was no representation on behalf of either of the parties. On 12.11.2024, matter was called out twice, there was no representation on behalf of both the parties. Thereafter, the matter was listed on 21.07.2025 and even on that date also, there was no representation on behalf of either of the parties. Hence, this Court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 04.08.2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30029 RPFC No. 54 of 2019 3. Today also, when the matter came up, there is no representation on behalf of either of the parties. It appears that, both the parties are not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3