APHC010585102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30380/2025 Between: PULLA VARA PRASAD RAJU, S/O. ANANDHAA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O,D. NO. 2-23, RAMAYAPALLE VILLAGE, HANUMANTHA PADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANIGIRI POLICE STATION KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, KANIGIRI POLICE STATION, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANDHAM SR PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 2 to 5 on Petitioner representation dated 26-09-2025, 01-10-2025, 06-10-2025 and 13-10-2025, as highly illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith 2 provide the Police Protection to the property of the Petitioner which is an agricultural land an extent of aces 3.04 cents in Survey No.257-A, vide documents No. 180/1999, 1997/1999 situated at Ramayapalle Village, Hanumantha Padu Mandal, Prakasam District.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.61 of 2025 on the file of Hanumanthunipadu Police Station for the offences under Sections 329(3), 324 (2) read with 3(5) of BNS has been registered and the same is under investigation. 3. Sri Gandham S.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30380 of 2025 Dt.18.11.2025 Dinesh