APHC010583192011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1101/2011 Between: 1. J.S. GANESH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS, S/O LATE R.J.SREERAMULU BUSINESS R/O 11-366, RADHA BUNGALOW, OLD PET, PALAMANER, 2. J.S.VIJAYA BABU, S/O LATE R.J.SREERAMULU BUSINESS R/O 11- 366, RADHA BUNGALOW, OLD PET, PALAMANER, 3. J.S. ASHOK KUMAR, S/O LATE R.J.SREERAMULU BUSINESS R/O 11-366, RADHA BUNGALOW, OLD PET, PALAMANER, 4. J.S.JAYANARAYANA, S/O LATE R.J.SREERAMULU BUSINESS R/O 12-299/1, M.C.R. NAGAR, MADANAPALLE ROAD, PALAMANER, 5. J.S.MURALI MOHAN, S/O LATE R.J.SREERAMULU BUSINESS R/O 11-366, RADHA BUNGALOW, OLD PET, PALAMANER, ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. R RAJENDRAN, S/o Radha Krishna Ex. M.P.P. R/o Radha Bungalow Road, Oldpet, Palamaner, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1869 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the common order dated 5-8- 2011 made in IA.NO. 106 of 2011 of I Addl. District Judge, Chittoor by accepting the necessary photo stat copies in the above CMA for the present. IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 1913 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction restraining the respondent from alienating or creating third party interest in respect of the Plaint Schedule properties in OS No. 20 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Chittoor, Pending disposal of the above Civil Miscellaneous Petition and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S V SUNDARARAJAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P RAVI KIRAN The Court made the following JUDGMENT: No representation for the appellants. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.07.2025, 01.08.2025 and 29.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.09.2025 KAS