APHC010141032023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7157 OF 2023 Between: 1. M/S. SRI ARUNA INDUSTRIES, PASALAPUDI VILLAGE, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBETHKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER CHINTHA SUBBA REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO. 50-27-5/1, TPT COLONY, SEETAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. CAUSE TITLE IS AMENDED AS PER COURT'S ORDER DT. 27/01/2025 IN IA 2/2023. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR TO GOVERNMENT, D.NO.77-16-175, GOVERNOR PET, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, APEPDC LTD., RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION, A.P.E.P.D.C. LTD., RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI 2 DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATION, APEPDC LTD., ANAPARTHI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. METTA CHANDRASEKHARA RAO 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 3. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri N. Subba Rao, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri B.V.Anjaneyulu, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Y. Nagendra, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.V.Satish, Ld. Standing Counsel for the APEPDCL. 2. Sri N. Subba Rao, Ld. Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri B.V.Anjaneyulu, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has submitted the Proceedings of the Deputy Executive Engineer (Operation), Mandapet bearing Letter No.Dy.EE/O/Mandapeta/F.No.MATS/D.No., dated 24.11.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Respondents and the same is taken on record. 3. In the said Proceedings, the Respondents have agreed for grant of additional Contract Minimum Demand of 150 KVA. The said Proceeding would also indicate that for the said purpose, the Writ Petitioner was directed to pay Development Charges, Security Deposit and Application Charges. Having so recorded, this Court is of the opinion that the relief sought by the Writ Petitioner has been redressed by the Respondents. 3 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.12.2025 Mnr 4 135 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.7157 OF 2023 Dt: 05.12.2025 Mnr