APHC010589592011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 376/2011 Between: 1. SMT.MADDIPATI SEETA NAGARATNAM @ M.SEETA RATNAM, W/O.APPA RAO HOUSEWIFE R/O.TIMMAPURAM, DWARAKATIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT ANR, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT O/O.ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER O/O.DWARAKATORUMALA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 749 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceeings in pursuance of the jdugement Award in Oa No.2147/2010 [Old No.126/2002] dated 07.02.2011 on the file of the AP Endowments Tribunal at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 1346 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in CMAMP NO. 749 of 2 2011 in CMA NO. 376 of 2011 dated 27-4-2011, in the interest of Justice and fair play. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 1289 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to receive entire arrears forth with in view of the orders, dt. 27.04.2011 in CMA M.P No. 749 of 2011 in CMA No. 376 of 2011 IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CMAMP 1510 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the orders dt. 24/07/2011 in CMA.MP.no. 749 of 2011 in CMA.No. 376 of 2011 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. D LALITHA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. PULIPATI RADHIKA The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: Though the matter was adjourned several times at request of learned counsel for the appellant, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant today. 2. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent-temple submits that possession has already been taken over by the temple. 3. In view of the above, the cause in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal does not survive for adjudication, and the appeal has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 18th September, 2025 cbn 4 194 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CMA No.376 of 2011 18th September, 2025 cbn