APHC010116622020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 809, 814 & 815/2020 Between: 1. LALAM SREERAMA MURTHY, S/O. BAPU NAIDU, AGED 46 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, RIO. D.NO.2/35, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. LALAM PYDI NAIDU, S/O. BAPU NAIDU, AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION R/O. D.NO.2/35, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. PALLI SATYAVATHI, W/O.APPALANAIDU, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT PEDABURUGUPALEM VILLAGE IN MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. KADIMPUDI LAKSHMI @ CHINATHALLI, W/O. CHINNARAO, AGED 42 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT METTAPALEM VILLAGE IN NARSIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RUTHULA BHASKARA RAO, S/O. KANNA BABU, AGED 42 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2/23, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. RUTTALA SOMUNAIDU, S/O. KANNABABU AGED 38 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2/23, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 3. LALAM LAKSHMI, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 2/24, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. RUTHALA SATYAVATHI, W/O LATE KANNABABU, AGED 56 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIVARTHI MRUTHYANJAYA SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Common Order: This Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred by the petitioners aggrieved by the decree and common order, dated 17.02.2020 passed in I.A.Nos.58, 59 and 60 of 2020 in O.S.No.134 of 2012 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Chodavaram. 2. Sri A. S. Virat, learned counsel representing Sri V. M. Sastry, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the main suit pending before the learned Court below has already been disposed of, and therefore, the cause in the present revisions no longer survives and the matters have become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petitions shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J. Date:07.11.2025 ARB 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Civil Revision Petition No.809, 814 and 815 of 2020 Date: 07.11.2025 ARB