GARAGA RAMA SATYANARAYANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10602/2020 · 2025-09-17
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54060 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54060 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010168472020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10602/2020 Between:
1. GARAGA RAMA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE BAPIRAJU, AGE 60 YEARS, CULTIVATION, D.NO.4-118, MADHAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. EATI NARAYANA MURTY, S/O. LATE TATAYYA NAIDU, AGE 45 YEARS, CULTIVATION, D.NO. 2-150, R/O MADHAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. KAVULURI VENKANNA, S/O. VENKATARAO, AGE 50 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
R/O D.NO.3-84/1, MADHAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SMT. GARAGA VISHNU PRIYA, W/O. VENKATA RAMARAO, AGE 45 YEARS, HOMEMAKER, D.NO.2-157, R/O. MADHAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SMT. INDUKURI SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/O. SURYA PRAKASA RAJU AGE 35 YEARS, HOME MAKER, R/O H.NO.2-11, NADI STREET, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
6. SMT. BHUPATHIRAJU CHAITANYA, W/O. RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU, AGE 33 YEARS, HOME MAKER, R/O. D.NO.8-401, VIVEKANANDA VEEDHI, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. SMT. GADIGOYALA NAGA LAKSHMI, S/O. SURYA CHANDRARAO, AGE 59 YEARS, HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO.3-20, MADHAVARAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 8. KASSE VEERABRAHAMAM @ BRAHMAYYA, S/O. KRISHNA MURTY,
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.10602 of 2020
AGE 60 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.2-72/1, MANDHAVARAM TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, W.G.DIST. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, KOVVUR, W.G.DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.10602 of 2020
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in intending to allot the road margin in Sy.Nos.22-1A2, 23-1A2, 24 and 25-1B of Madhavaram Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District, towards house sites under the Navaratnalu-Pedaluandaraki-illu abutting the petitioners’ lands in Sy.Nos.22-2a1A, 22-2a2, 22-2a3, 22-2a4,23-1a, 23-2, 25- 3 and 26. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land, described as road margin, if so required for any public purpose. 4.
In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose and if the petitioners make any representation for the said purpose with respect to the subject land, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the respondent authorities concerned strictly in accordance with law by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the petitioners and upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.10602 of 2020
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
18.09.2025 PGT