- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37882 RSA No. 1372 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1372 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. K.T. PUTTASWAMY S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGE 73 YEARS, MECHANIC 2. SANATH KUMAR S/O LATE SHANTHARAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS APPELLANTS ARE RESIDENTS OF HUNASEMARADHA BEEDHI BEHIND KANNIKA PARAMESHWARI TEMPLE, CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577 101 APPELLANT NO.2 IS REPRESENTED BY G.P.A HOLDER APPELLANT NO.1 K.T. PUTTASWAMY. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. UMESH MULIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA (MANDALI REP BY ITS PRESIDENT B.M. SREE ROAD CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY - 577 101. 2. VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA (MANDALI) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECREARY B.M. SREE ROAD CHIKKAMAGALURU CITY - 577 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGHNESHWAR S. SHASTRI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. R. GURURAJ, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37882 RSA No. 1372 of 2020 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.10.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.13/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKAMAGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2020 PASSED IN OS.No.552/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE IIND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKAMAGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties are present with their respective Advocates. Respondents are represented by Sri.Vigneshwar S. Shastri, learned Senior Counsel. 2. After addressing the arguments at length, compromise petition is filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. 3. Contents of the compromise petition is read over to the parties and parties agree that the contents of the compromise petition depict the true terms of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37882 RSA No. 1372 of 2020 settlement and there is no force, coercion or undue influence in reaching out the terms of settlement. 4. Accordingly, there is no impediment for this Court to dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 5. Hence, the following: ORDER i. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. ii. Office is directed to pass a modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43 CT: BHK