Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54039 (AP)

Inturi Anuradha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/4699/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010064452021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. Inturi Anuradha,, W/o Srinivasa Rao, aged about 50 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 10th Lane, Arandalpeta, Guntur, Guntur District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, , Guntur Urban, Guntur District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur District. 4. Kasu Sridevi, , W/o Srikanth Reddy, aged about 35 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur District 5. Kasu Srikanth Reddy, S/o and age not known to the Petitioner. Door No.15-14-148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur District 6. Kasu Konda Reddy, S/o Venkateswara Reddy, aged about 58 years. R/o Door No 15-14-148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur District IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4699 OF 2021 1. Inturi Anuradha,, W/o Srinivasa Rao, aged about 50 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. 10th Lane, Arandalpeta, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home , Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, , Guntur Urban, Guntur District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur District. 4. Kasu Sridevi, , W/o Srikanth Reddy, aged about 35 years. Door No.15 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur District 5. Kasu Srikanth Reddy, S/o and age not known to the Petitioner. Door 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur S/o Venkateswara Reddy, aged about 58 years. R/o 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Inturi Anuradha,, W/o Srinivasa Rao, aged about 50 years, Occ Housewife, ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur District. years. Door No.15-14- 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur District 5. Kasu Srikanth Reddy, S/o and age not known to the Petitioner. Door 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur S/o Venkateswara Reddy, aged about 58 years. R/o 148/A, Shop Employees Colony, Main Road, Guntur, Guntur ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in taking any action against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 basing on the endorsement given by the 2nd respondent in CCC.No. 329/2020, dt. 03.02.2020 directing the 3rd respondent to enquire into the matter and to submit his report is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to act upon and take appropriate action on the endorsement given by the 2nd respondent in CCC.No. 329/2020, dt. 03.02.2020, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to act upon and take necessary action on the endorsement given by the 2nd respondent in CCC.No. 329/2020, dt. 03.02.2020 and to provide police protection to the petitioner from the hands of the respondents 4 to 6, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:PRABHU NATH VASIREDDY The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4699 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in taking any action against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 basing on the endorsement given by the 2nd respondent in CCC.No. 329/2020, dt. 03.02.2020 directing the 3rd respondent to enquire into the matter and to submit his report is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the fundamental rights enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to act upon and take appropriate action on the endorsement given by the 2nd respondent in CCC.No. 329/2020, dt. 03.02.2020, and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 14.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 43 W.P.No.4699 of 2021 Dated.14.10.2025 KKV