Arulananthasamy v. State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police
CRL RC/907/2025 · 2025-06-27
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54035 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54035 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025 Arulananthasamy ... Petitioner Versus The State Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station, Thiruvarur District ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS, 2023, praying to set aside the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi in CMP.No.5457 of 2024 and consequentially direct the respondent to conduct proper enquiry and take appropriate action on the petitioner's complaint dated 17.04.2024 and
24.05.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthick Sevugapperumal For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side)
ORDER This criminal revision case has been preferred against the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025
order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi in CMP.No.5457 of 2024, thereby dismissing the petition filed under Section 175(3) of BNSS for seeking direction to register FIR.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the aforesaid petition was dismissed only on the ground that the petitioner failed to lodge any complaint before the jurisdictional police.
3. Heard, the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused, all the materials placed before this Court.
4. On perusal of the complaint lodged by the petitioner, it is revealed that there was a group clash, for which a criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. However, also the petitioner lodged a complaint and the same was enquired and closed. Therefore, no prima facie case is made out to register any FIR. Hence, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order and this criminal revision case is liable to be dismissed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025
5. In view of the above discussion, this criminal revision case is dismissed. 27.06.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order lok To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruthuraipoondi Police Station, Thiruvarur District 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025 Crl.RC.No.907 of 2025 27.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis