1 2025:CGHC:57250 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 419 of 2018 1 - Sanjay Kishore Das S/o Shri Radha Serveshwar Das Aged About 45 Years R/o Chhuikhadan, Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh......(Plaintiff), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Vijay Laxmi (Deleted) As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 21-06- 2022 2 - Ghanshyam Das S/o Late Rituparna Kishore Das Aged About 58 Years R/o Chhuikhadan Bada, Infront Of Raj Kumar College, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Mahalaxmi Devi D/o Rituparna Kishore Das Aged About 60 Years Wife Of Raja Ramchandra, R/o Munipal, Post Pallahara, District- Angul (Odisha)., District : Anugul *, Orissa 4 - Chudamani Kishore Das (Since Dead) Through Legal Heris 4.(A) Ku. Bhagyashri Das D/o Late Chudamani Das R/o Ward No. 7, Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4.(B) Ku. Minakshi Das D/o Late Chudamani Das R/o Ward No. 7, Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shivendra Kishore Das S/o Radha Serveshwar Kishore Das Aged About 50 Years R/o Chhuikhadan Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - J. K. Vaishnav S/o Radha Serveshwar Kishore Das Aged About 46 Years R/o Chhuikhadan Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.27 11:25:47 +0530 2 For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent No. 2(A)/proposed legal representative of Respondent No.2. : Mr. Syed Jayed Ziya Ali, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.7/State : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25/11/2025 1. It transpires that the matter was listed on 28.10.2025, but no one appeared on that date for the appellant and the case was adjourned. Again on 13.11.2025, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and the case was again adjourned. Today also, when the matter was called for hearing twice, no one appears on behalf of the appellant to pursue his appeal. 2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved