IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:lAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY.OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21361 OF 2005 Between: K. Shiva Kishore Kumar, S/o. K. Satyanarayana, aged about 30 years, Occ.Work Inspector, Srikalahasteeswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Srikalahasthi, R/o. 4/592, D.V.Street, Srikalahasthi, chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Revenue ( Endowments), Secretariat Bldgs., Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, -Endowments Dept., Govt of A.P., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3. Srikalahasteesvyara Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District, rep. by its Executive Officer/Joint Commissioner. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in keeping abeyance of the services of the petitioner by issuing g.O.Rt.No.1123, Revenue (Endts.l) Dept., dt.6.6.2p05 and its consequential orders issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.V2/25318/2005-12, dt.15.6.2005 and yet another consequential order issued by the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.A1/421/2004, dt.21.6.2005 and not paying the S.S.R. rates to the petitioner as fixed earlier is illegal, void and against the principles of natural justice and set aside % I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 27368 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasfed direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Technical Assistant (Work Inspector) in the 3rd respondent institution by granting payment of S.S.R. Rates as fixed in earlier proceedings of the then commissioner of Endowments, pending the disposal of the W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI V VENUGOPALA RAO The Court made the following: Order APHC010161742005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS [3332] / THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21361/2005 \ \ Between: K. Shiva Kishore Kumar, Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER AND I he Govtof A P Revtsdue Eriuowme(Ut> Depi And 2 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...KbbPuNDbN I (S) 1.GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 2.E SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and no orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT R //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI GANGISETTY RAJESWARA One CC to SRI V VENU GOPALA RAO Two^CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Three CD Copies RAO Advocate [OPUC] Advocate [OPUC] 2. 3. 4. gsg HIGH COURT DATED; 01/05/2025 i ORDER WP.No.21361 of 2005 2 6 SEP 2025 % 70 ifar m O Co.'S Current Section WITl!ourS)™l""’ ""^''“CTUOUS