Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54022 (PNJ)

MANPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/27825/2023 · 2025-04-30

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 260 Manpreet Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Singh Tiwana, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No. *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section Criminal Procedure Code under Section 376 IPC Bathinda. 2. Status report by way of affidavit of Pardeep Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub behalf of respondents No.1 to 6 has been filed in the court today wherein it is stated that the petitioner has been ac passed by the Court of 3. In this view of the matter, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. Disposed of, as ha April 30, 2025 Pankaj* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision: Manpreet Singh Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Singh Tiwana, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.7. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No.42 dated 09.07.2022 under Section 376 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar, Rampura, District Status report by way of affidavit of Pardeep Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Rampura Phul, District Bathinda on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6 has been filed in the court today wherein it is stated that the petitioner has been acquitted vide judgment passed by the Court of Judge, Special Court/Addl. Sessions Judge In this view of the matter, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of, as having become infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.27825 of 2023 Date of Decision:30.04.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Yuvraj Singh Tiwana, AAG, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the seeking quashing of FIR No.42 dated 09.07.2022 registered at Police Station Sadar, Rampura, District Status report by way of affidavit of Pardeep Singh, PPS, Deputy Division Rampura Phul, District Bathinda on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6 has been filed in the court today wherein it is quitted vide judgment dated 19.11.2024 /Addl. Sessions Judge, Bathinda. In this view of the matter, learned State counsel submits that the ving become infructuous. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No ... Petitioner ... Respondents 482 of the seeking quashing of FIR No.42 dated 09.07.2022 registered at Police Station Sadar, Rampura, District Status report by way of affidavit of Pardeep Singh, PPS, Deputy Division Rampura Phul, District Bathinda on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6 has been filed in the court today wherein it is 19.11.2024 In this view of the matter, learned State counsel submits that the PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.05.01 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh