SAMPADAK PATRAKAR GRUH NIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD., THR. PRESIDENT/ CHAIRMAN, DILIP P. BHOJRAJ v. LEARNED DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS
WP/5416/2024 · 2025-10-06
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54021 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54021 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 54-wp 5416.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5416 OF 2024 ( Sampadak Patrakar Gruh Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. vs. Learned Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and others ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or the directions, Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Mr. U.V.Sonkusare, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. H.R.Dhumale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 7. Mr. Sachin Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.6.
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
OCTOBER 06, 2025 1) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents. 2) The petitioner has challenged the order dated 06/03/2024 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati in Case No./LND-18/KARANJA WASHIM/01/2021-2022 and the
order dated 20/10/2021 passed by the Collector, Washim. 3) Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State submitted that the petitioner is having alternate and equally efficacious remedy to file appeal/revision under the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. 4) In that view of the matter, the petition stands disposed of as not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the orders passed by both the Authorities before the State Government within a period of four weeks from today. Time spent in prosecuting the Writ Petition to be taken into consideration by the concerned Authority, while deciding application while deciding application for condonation of delay.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBARE, J.) KOLHE 2025:BHC-NAG:10297