Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54020 (AP)

ShakGhousulWara, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7304/2019 · 2025-12-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010169182019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7304/2019 Between: 1. SHAKGHOUSULWARA,, S/OS.MAHABOOB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR ASSISTANT RIO. D.NO. 3/675-1, RAJA REDDY STREET, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ROOM NO.192, GROUND FLOOR, BUILDING NO.05, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KADAPA,YSR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICEIII, AP SPECIAL POLICE BATTALIONS, KURNOOL. 5. THE COMMANDANT, XI BATTALION, AP SPECIAL POLICE, BHAKARAPET, KADAPA. YSR DISTRICT. 6. K ABDUL KHADER, S/O. K. ABDUL RAHIM, AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, 0/O THE COMMANDANT, XI BATTALION, APSP, BHAKARAPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's representation, dated 30-03-2019 to take disciplinary action against 6th respondent who posted a highly objectionable whatsapp 2 message against BJP in AP Police Ministerial Staff Association Whatsapp group on 27-03-2019 while Model Code of Conduct was in force, is arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violation of model code of conduct and violation of Article of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 30- 03-2019 to take disciplinary action against 6th respondent by posting a highly objectionable whatsapp message against BJP in AP Police Ministerial Staff Association Whatsapp group on 27-03 2019 while model code of conduct was in force and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated: 30-03-2019 2019 by taking disciplinary action against 6th respondent who posted a communal and highly objectionable whatsapp message against BJP in AP Police Ministerial Staff Association Whatsapp group on 27-03¬2019 while model code of conduct was in force and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENJURI VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7304 of 2019 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 and 4, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn 4 76 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7304 of 2019 4th December, 2025 cbn