S.SENKOTTAIYAN,DHARMAKARTHA v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
WP/17957/2025 · 2025-06-04
P Velmurugan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54018 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54018 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 17957 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN WP No. 17957 of 2025
1. S.Senkottaiyan, Dharmakartha S/o.Selamban, Maachampalayam, Moliyapalli Village, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Superintendent Of Police Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2.The Inspector Of Police Rural Police Station, Thiruchengode, Namakkal District. 3.K.Saravanan S/o. Karuppan, No.2/78, Devendaran Street, Maachamapalayam Village, 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17957 of 2025 Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the Respondents 1 and 2 from giving any permission and police protection to the 3rd respondent or any others persons to conduct any festival separately, in our private temple Sree Maha Mariamman Temple situated in Moliyappalli village, Maachampalayam, Thiruchengode Taluk, namakkal District on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 08.03.2025. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Dr.C.E.Prapatp Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R1and R2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents 1 and 2 from giving any permission and police protection to the 3rd respondent or any others persons to conduct any festival separately, in our private temple Sree Maha Mariamman Temple situated in Moliyappalli village, Maachampalayam, Thiruchengode Taluk, namakkal District on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 08.03.2025. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17957 of 2025
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record.
3. On a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court finds that the petitioner is not entitled to seek the relief as sought for in this writ petition.
4. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 04-06-2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17957 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent Of Police Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2.The Inspector Of Police Rural Police Station, Thiruchengode, Namakkal District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 17957 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN J. mfa WP No. 17957 of 2025
04-06-2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis