HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37299 of 2022 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including order dated 07.09.2022, of Criminal Case No.1395 of 2019 (State Vs. Vipin Kumar Sharma and others), arising out of Case Crime No.393 of 2019, under Sections 308, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.- Vrindavan, District- Mathura, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident no one has sustained any serious injury. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, the copy of order of the same is available on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bhupendra Singh, G.A. Vipin Kumar Sharma And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) and injured do not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire impugned proceedings, including summoning order and chargesheet, of the aforesaid case, against applicants namely Vipin Kumar Sharma, Urmila Devi, Dinesh, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 16, 2025 CS/- A482 No. 37299 of 2022 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad