Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5401 (UTT)

SANGEETA MALIK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/721/2021 · 2025-02-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:689 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 721 of 2021 UHon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Mohit Bhanryal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Aayush Gaur, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. Petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No. 0069 of 2021 registered against them under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC in Police Station Vasant Vihar, District Dehradun. 3. The impugned FIR is on record as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 4. Learned State counsel submits that upon investigation, Final/Closure Report has been filed in the matter as the evidence collected was found not to be sufficient. He thus submits that the writ petition has become infructuous on account of filing of closure report. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the said submission made by State Counsel. 6. In such view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.02.2025 Mahinder/