Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35561 WP No. 24646 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24646 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI KUMAR, S/O. LATE. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED 58 YEARS R/AT. CHANDRAMOULESHWARA EXTENSION,NEAR OLD POST OFFICE, KYATHASANDRA, TUMKUR-572 104. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR K.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI.RAJANNA S/O LATE.GOVINDAPPA AGED 50 YEARS
2. SHRI.SIDDAPPA S/O LATE.GOVINDAPPA, AGED 41 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/AT RAMAIAHANAPALYA, AREGUJJANAHALLI MAJARE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK- 572 104. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF INIDAN CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO O.S. NO. 225/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDL., CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMKUR, AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35561 WP No. 24646 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question a compromise entered into a decree drawn on such compromise in O.S.No.225/2017.
2. The compromise is not before the Lok-Adalath but, before the Court.
3. Therefore, the petitioner has to prefer an appeal under Order 23 Rule 3(a) of the CPC before the very same Court and not a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4. With the aforesaid observations and reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 410