Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5400 (PNJ)

RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT v. DHIRENDRA KHADGATA, IAS, FARIDABAD

COCP/5852/2025 · 2026-03-16

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-5852-2025 (O&M) -1- 227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5852-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 Residents Welfare Association (East Block) Surya Nagar Faridabad ......Petitioner Vs. Sh. Dhirendra Khadgata ......Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Karter Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Divyanshu Shukla, Advocate, for Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 24.05.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-8311-2018, whereby on the statement made by learned counsel for respondent-Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, that demolition notices were issued and demolition of the unauthorized construction would be carried out on 07.06.2024, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous and liberty was granted to the petitioner to pursue its remedy in case any further cause of action accrues. 2. In compliance of the order dated 24.05.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-8311-2018, short reply by way of affidavit dated 13.03.2026 VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.17 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-5852-2025 (O&M) -2- of Dhirendra Khadgata, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Faridabad, along with Annexures R-1 to R-5, has been filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 in Court. The same is taken on record. 3. A perusal of paragraph No.2 of the same shows that unauthorized construction could not be demolished due to restrained order passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad. Respondent has also placed on record Annexures R-1 to R-5 to show his inability to comply with the order dated 24.05.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-8311-2018. 4. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 16.03.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.17 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document