DANCY DORA SYIEM v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.
WP(C)/563/2025 · 2026-02-03
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.06 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 563 of 2025
Date of Decision: 03.02.2026
Smti. Dancy Dora Syiem, W/o Petar Allan Thorose, St. Peter’s H.S.School,
Dhankheti, Shillong – 793003, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat Building, Shillong – 793 001, Meghalaya.
2. The Director of School Education & Literacy, Govt. of Meghalaya. Shillong.
3. The Chairman of Meghalaya State Pollution Control Board, Lumpyngngad, Shillong – 793 014, District – East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, District-East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, Pin – 793001.
…Respondents
2026:MLHC:29
2
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : -
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. N.D.Chullai, AAG with
Mr. E.R.Chyne, GA for R 1,2 & 4.
Ms. O.A.I.Bang, Adv. for R 3.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. On 02-02-2026, order was specifically passed which is quoted hereinbelow:
“When the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
It is noted in the last order dated 08.12.2025, that liberty was granted to the petitioner to implead necessary parties, inasmuch as, the person/proprietor of the building under construction who is stated to be the cause of noise pollution, has not been arrayed as a party.
A perusal of the office note indicates that no steps have been taken by the petitioner, to implead further parties.
In this view of the matter, list this matter tomorrow i.e. 03.02.2026.
In the event that no appearance is made on the next date, the matter shall stand dismissed.” 2026:MLHC:29
3
2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner.
3. Accordingly, matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Judge
2026:MLHC:29 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.02.03 17:58:02 IST