Jangiti Satyam Raju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/8423/2022 · 2025-10-06
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53997 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010132882022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 8423/2022 Between:
1. JANGITI SATYAM RAJU,, S/O. NARASIMHUDU, AGED 45 YEARS, AGRICULTURE AND CONTRACTOR, RIO. KOTAKONDA VILLAGE, RUDRAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, (WRD) WORKS DIVISION, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I. WORKS SUB-DIVISION, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I. WORKS, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, NELAPADU VILLAGE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. THE DIRECTORATE OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, 3RD FLOOR, 'C'
BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521456, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS. 8. THE ASSISTANT PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND PROJECTS, TEKKE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the rejection orders Dt.29/30.9.2019 of the 7th respondent in relation to the execution of works under Neeru Chettu Programme vide Agreement No. 1259/2017-18 for Rs.9,17,633/-, Agreement No. 1459/2018-19, for Rs.9,21,753 /- and Agreement No. 3077/2018-19 for Rs.9,15,376/- which were approved for payment by the 8th respondent in the CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System) vide Bill Nos.2018-2085149 (2019-286210), 2018- 2084982 (2019-287005) and 2018-2563992 (2019-287710) as arbitrary, illegal, devoid of any reasons and one without power or jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the amounts in respect of works executed under agreements vide CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System) Bill Nos.2018-2085149 (2019-286210) for Rs.9.17,633, 2018-2084982 (2019-287005), for Rs.9,21,753/- and 2018-2563992 (2019- 287710) for Rs.9,15,376/-, respectively and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to pay the amounts in respect of works executed under Agreement No. 1259/2017-18, Dt.13-32018 Agreement No. 1459/2018-19, Dt.7-5-2018 and Agreement No. 3077/2018-19 Dt.18-9-2018 approved vide CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System) Bill Nos. 2018¬2085149 (2019-286210) for Rs.9.17,633, 2018-2084982 (2019- 287005), for Rs.9,21,753/- and 2018-2563992 (2019-287710) for Rs.9,15,376/-, respectively, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SMT.
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.8423 of 2022
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“….to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the rejection orders Dt.29/30.9.2019 of the 7th respondent in relation to the execution of works under Neeru Chettu Programme vide Agreement No. 1259/2017-18 for Rs.9,17,633/-, Agreement No. 1459/2018-19, for Rs.9,21,753 /- and Agreement No. 3077/2018-19 for Rs.9,15,376/- which were approved for payment by the 8th respondent in the CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System) vide Bill Nos.2018- 2085149 (2019-286210), 2018-2084982 (2019-287005) and 2018-2563992 (2019-287710) as arbitrary, illegal, devoid of any reasons and one without power or jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the amounts in respect of works executed under agreements vide CFMS (Comprehensive Financial Management System) Bill Nos.2018-2085149 (2019-286210) for Rs.9.17,633, 2018-2084982 (2019-287005), for Rs.9,21,753/- and 2018-2563992 (2019-287710) for Rs.9,15,376/-, respectively and to pass…”
2. Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Mr. C. Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that as the amounts payable to the petitioner have already been paid pending the writ petition, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Page 5 of 6
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :07.10.2025 TVN
97
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.8423 OF 2022
Date: 07.10.2025 TVN