2025:KER:28986 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 426 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.25513 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: B. SREEDEVI AGED 41 YEARS WIFE OF PRABHAKARA PAI, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PALLIKKAL, PALLAM, WADAKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680582 BY ADVS. P.A.JENZIA V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS : 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE – II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014 3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680003 2025:KER:28986 RP NO.426 of 2025 in W.P.(C) No.25513 of 2023 2 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD,THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680020 5 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER VALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680567 6 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER WADAKANCHERI, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680582 7 THE MANAGER KOORIKUZHI AM UP SCHOOL, KAIPAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT – 680 681. & AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PALLIKKAL, PALLAM, WADAKANCHERI THRISSUR DISTRICT & JANAKIYA VIDHYALAM MACHADU, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680582 8 THE HEADMASTER AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PALLIKKAL, PALLAM, WADAKANCHERI, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680582 9 SMT. BEENA C THAMBI LPSA, JANAKEEYA VIDYALAYAM, MACHADU, WADAKKANCHERY , THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680582 10 SMT. STEPHY M.K., LPSA, AMUP SCHOOL KOORIKUZHI, KAIPAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680681 11 SMT. SREEJA K.S LPST, GLP SCHOOL, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679534 SRI.FAYAZ M A THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:28986 RP NO.426 of 2025 in W.P.(C) No.25513 of 2023 3 ORDER Dated this the 4th day of April, 2025 The review petitioner submits that the respondents were retrenched only on 14.07.2016 and this Court erroneously noted that they became Rule 51A claimants with effect from 15.07.2015, which is a patent error. If this Court has considered 15.07.2016 as the correct date of Rule 51A claim, the judgment would have been otherwise. 2. Going through the judgment, I find that there is a prima facie case in the Review Petition. In the circumstances, the Review Petition is allowed and the judgment dated 10.03.2025 in W.P.(C) No.25513 of 2023 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to file. Post the writ petition for hearing on 26.05.2025. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh