APHC010044552020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. M Prabhakar,, S/o. M Munaswamy Aged about 40 years, Advocate, Nalagamalle (V), Bangarupalyam (M), Chittoor District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary, Home and Legislative Affairs Amaravathi 2. The Inspector General of Police, Amaravathi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, , Chittoor District, Chittoor 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palamaneru, Chittoor District 5. The Circle Inspector, Gangavaram, Chittoor District 6. The Station House Officer, Banganipalyam, Chittoor District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ of Nos.3 and 5 in not considering petitioners representations/ a complaint on 16 12-2019 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2557 OF 2020 1. M Prabhakar,, S/o. M Munaswamy Aged about 40 years, Advocate, Nalagamalle (V), Bangarupalyam (M), Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary, Home and rs Amaravathi 2. The Inspector General of Police, Amaravathi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, , Chittoor District, Chittoor 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palamaneru, Chittoor District 5. The Circle Inspector, Gangavaram, Chittoor District Station House Officer, Banganipalyam, Chittoor District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 and 5 in not considering petitioners representations/ a complaint on 16 2019 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. M Prabhakar,, S/o. M Munaswamy Aged about 40 years, Advocate, ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary, Home and 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palamaneru, Chittoor District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 and 5 in not considering petitioners representations/ a complaint on 16- IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Nos.3 and5 to consider the petitioners representations/ a complaint on 16-12-2019 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: B V S CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2557 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 and 5 in not considering petitioners representations/ a complaint on 16-12-2019 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law 2. Heard Sri M.Prabhakar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submits that basing on the complaint dated 16.12.2019 of the petitioner, a crime has already been registered vide FIR No.30/2020 dated 08.02.2020. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2557 of 2020 Dated.03.09.2025 KKV 84