IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE AMARAVATI PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAyi CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16532 OF 2005 Between; A. Gouri Shankar. E-454819, Vulcaniser of TRSA/ZM, R/o Vizianagaram Vizianagaram District ...Petitioner AND 1. The APSRTC, Rep. by Executive Director, Vijayawada & Vizianagaram Zones, MOBS, Hyderabad. 2. The Works Manager, APSRTC., Zonal, Work Shop, Vizianagaram. 3. The Assistant Mechanical Engineer (Tyres), Tyre Retreading shop, Vizianagaram. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondents imposing the punishment of reduction of pay by 2 incremental may or any other appropriate Writ, herein in stages for a period of 2 years with cumulative effect vide Proc. No. PA/19(170)/04- ED(V&V), dt 15-3-2005 while modifying the punishment of removal from service issued by the R3 in Proc. NO. TRI/802(1)/03-TRSA/ZM, dt 5-12- 2003 as illegal, unjust and arbitrary and as such liable to be set aside the with a consequential direction to pay the wages for the period out of employment and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 21019 OF 20nfi) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the above Writ Petition and such other order or orders as may deem fit and circumstances of the case. pass proper in the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: APHC010114502005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO; 16532/2005 Between: A. Gouri Shankar E-454819 ...PETITIONER AND The Apsrtc Rep By Executive Director 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners 2. are not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA assistant REGU BABU iTRAR //TRUE COPY// I To, SECTION OFFICER T OneCCto SRI. S M SUBHAN 2. One CC to SRI. VINOD for APSRTC) [OPUCJ 3. Three CD Copies . Advocate fOPUCJ KUMAR TARLADA (STANDING COUNSEL sree HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.16532 of 2005 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS