SMT KUMBHA KOTESWARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/22633/2024 · 2025-11-23
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53984 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53984 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010443332024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 22633 of 2024 Between:
1. SMT KUMBHA KOTESWARI, W/O D. NANCHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 0793030, SRIDEVAKI SWAYAM SAHAYIKA SANGAM, R/O TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT KATTIKA NAGA ARUNA, W/O SRINIVASRAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 0793015, KRANTHI SWAYAM SAHAYIKA SANGAM, R/O TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT. B. LAKSHMI SUJATHA, W/O DVS RAMAKRISHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 0684284, RAMANUJA SWAYAM SAHAYIKA SANGAM, R/O NPR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SMT JEELAGA MANIKYAM, W/O CHINNA GALAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 0793031, RUTUMAHILA GROUP, R/O TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SMT MOTURI NAGAMANI, W/O SUNDARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 0793008, CHAITANYANALAHARI SWAYAM SAHAYIKA SANGAM R/O
2
TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS EX-OFFICIO SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER, AP STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD, D. NO. 10-152/1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, SRI SAI TOWERS, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520007. 3. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., D. NO. 10-152/1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, SRI SAI TOWERS, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT -
520007. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not providing reservation to the Dwarka Group issued GO.Ms. No. 10 dated 03.09.2024 and circular memo dated 15.09.2024 is contrary to the GO.Ms. No. 4 dated 19.11.2011 and GO.Ms. No. 32 dated 03.12.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently set aside the same. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased suspended the GO.Ms.
No. 10 dated 03.09.2024
3
and circular memo dated 15.09.2024 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to modify the order passed in WP. No. 22633 of 2024 dated 04.10.2024 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to file the present reply counter in WP. No. 22633 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P HEMACHANDRA
2. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
3. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
4. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
4
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No. 22633 of 2024
ORDER:
The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not providing reservation to the Dwarka Group issued GO.Ms. No. 10 dated 03.09.2024 and circular memo dated 15.09.2024 is contrary to the GO.Ms. No. 4 dated 19.11.2011 and GO.Ms. No.32 dated 03.12.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently set aside the same.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents.
3.
Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that this case is squarely covered by a Common Order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No. 31505 of 2024 and batch dated 17.11.2025.
4. Having perused the said Common Order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 31505 of 2024 and batch and batch dated 17.11.2025, and the facts in the present case, this Court is of the view that
5
the present case is squarely covered by the said Common Order. The operative portion of the common order is extracted hereunder:
“…this Court feels it appropriate to direct the respondents to specify in the notification, the category to which the fair price shop is being reserved and that the applications submitted by the DWCRA group members, who fall under Clause IX (iii) of G.O.Ms.No.32 dated 03.12.2018 and the subsequent circular instructions dated 15.09.2024 shall be received subject to fulfillment of roster point, age and educational qualifications as per the notification. With the above observations, these Writ Petitions are allowed setting aside the impugned notifications pertaining to the petitioners Fair Price Shops with a liberty to the respondents to issue fresh notification in accordance with the above directions. There shall be no
order as to costs….”
5. In view of the above extract, this case is also disposed of on the basis of the operative portion of the Common Order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 31505 of 2024 and batch dated
17.11.2025.
6. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the order, dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 31505 of 2024 and batch to this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 24.11.2025. JAK/MH
6
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
278
WRIT PETITION No. 22633 of 2024
Date :24.11.2025 JAK/MH