CWP-12870-2025 (O&M) 129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Darshan Devi and others State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of plot to the petitioners of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted plot is under litigation/ dispute/ non and the petitioners’ entitlement to alternative plot is duly covered und HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P appropriate relief. 2. At the outset, l petitioners would be satisfied, in case, 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Darshan Devi and others versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to plot to the petitioners of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, originally allotted plot is under litigation/ dispute/ non and the petitioners’ entitlement to alternative plot is duly covered und HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P appropriate relief. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, their 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12870-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 07, 2025 ….Petitioners ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. respondents No.2 and 3. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to allot an alternative plot to the petitioners of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, originally allotted plot is under litigation/ dispute/ non-possessionable, and the petitioners’ entitlement to alternative plot is duly covered under the HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P-6), thereby necessitating earned counsel for the petitioners submits that their pending representation dated 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ allot an alternative plot to the petitioners of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, possessionable, er the , thereby necessitating submits that dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-12870-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) is considered and decided by respondent No.2, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsels for the respondents appear and oppose issuance of notice of motion. They submit that grievance of the petitioners will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment