Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53979 (KAR)

M/S SBMS CONCRETE v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/2436/2025 · 2025-09-08

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38007 WP No. 2436 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 2436 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: M/S SBMS CONCRETE REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI BELE SIVAIAH S/O SRI. YERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, PRESENTLY ADDRESS AT NO.4, GATEWAY PARK, NALLURHALLI, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE 560 066. PAN- ACNFS7615Q. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), C. R. BUILDING, III FLOOR QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL), C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.DILIP., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT DATED 09/03/2022 BEARING DIN AND NOTICE NO. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38007 WP No. 2436 of 2025 ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1040496263(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: "i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Act dated 09/03/2022 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1040496263(1) issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A1. ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 27/09/2023 passed under section 148A(d) of the Act bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/COM/M/17/2023-24/1056580297(1) issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A2. iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 27/09/2023 issued under section 148 of the Act bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/COM/M/17/2023-24/1056584968(1) issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - АЗ. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38007 WP No. 2436 of 2025 iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the approval dated 27/09/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/COM/M/17/2023-24/1056582975(1) issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexuге - В. v) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Heard Sri Annamalai S., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M. Dilip, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The grounds projected in the subject petition in support of the prayer quoted supra are identical to the ones considered by this Court in W.P.No.28182/2024 and connected matters, disposed on 28.08.2025. 4. In the light of the issue being similar and the reasons rendered therein becomes applicable to the case at hand, the petition deserves to be disposed on the same lines. Therefore, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38007 WP No. 2436 of 2025 Section 151A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in this petition would stand quashed. (ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive the petition in the event, the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the matter pending before it. (iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petition is allowed. (iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of this petition would become necessary. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BSV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 215