APHC010605182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31453/2025 Between: 1. SRI J.C. RANGA REDDY,, S/O J.P. RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC RETD. BANK MANAGER, R/O H.NO. 6-5-454, ANDHRA BANK COLONY, MARUTHI NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANANTHAPURAMU. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANANTHAPURAMU. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. SRI RACHURU VENKATA RAMANA SASTRY, S/O.R.VENKATA RAMA SASTRY, AGED NOT KNOWN R/O.D.NO.11/61, SUBBAPPA COMPOUND, RAMASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, A.P 2 7. RACHURU SUBRAMANYAM SASTRY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER. AGED NOT KNOWN, R/OGUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 herein in trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioners herein from the petitioners subject property i.e. Plot Nos. 99 and 100, in an approved layout in Sy.No. 34/1, 34/5, 34/2, 34/6, and 34/7, admeasuring a total extent of 484 Sq. Yards (approx. 0.10 cents), situated at Papampet Village, Ananthapuramu Rural Mandal at the active instance and instigation of the Respondents No. 6 and 7 herein, in spite of the representation dated 06.11.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, opposed to the established principles of Law and further in violation of Right to Property guaranteed under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner land herein by following due process of law and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 herein to not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property i.e.. Plot Nos. 99 and 100, in an approved layout in Sy.No. 34/1, 34/5, 34/2, 34/6, and 34/7, admeasuring a total extent of 484 Sq. Yards (approx. 0.10 cents), situated at Papampet Village, Ananthapuramu Rural Mandalpending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 herein in trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioners herein from the petitioners subject property i.e. Plot Nos. 99 and 100, in an approved layout in Sy.No. 34/1, 34/5, 34/2, 34/6, and 34/7, admeasuring a total extent of 484 Sq. Yards (approx. 0.10 cents), situated at Papampet Village, Ananthapuramu Rural Mandal at the active instance and instigation of the Respondents No.6 and 7 herein, in spite of the representation dated 06.11.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, opposed to the established principles of Law and further in violation of Right to Property guaranteed under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner land herein by following due process of law and pass such….” 2. Heard M/s. Ayesha Azma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents, on instructions, submitted that the respondents are not interfering and there was no proposal also for dispossessing the petitioner from the subject property as the entire land is covered by residential houses. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition may be closed. 4 5. The submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader is recorded and the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 09.12.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.31453 of 2025 08.12.2025 RD