IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48815 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1. Vidyasagar Choudhary S/o Bihari Choudhary Resident of village- Kajipur, PS- Simri, District- Buxar 2. Lal Babu Choudhary S/o Ramraj Choudhary Resident of village- Kajipur, PS- Simri, District- Buxar 3. Guddu Choudhary S/o Dhananjay Choudhary @ Dhanejar Choudhary Resident of village- Kajipur, PS- Simri, District- Buxar 4. Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Choudhary S/o Mohan Manjhi @ Mohan Choudhary Resident of village- Kajipur, PS- Simri, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners for the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 303(2), 74, 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, registered in connection with Simri P.S.Case No. 49 of 2025. 3. According to allegation, the petitioners came at the stage where orchestra programme was going on. They pushed the dancer and she fell on the generator and suffered injury. They also snatched Rs.12,000/- from the possession of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48815 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 the informant. The C.T. scan report was perused by the doctor and he found right lobe focal calcified granuloma on the parietal region of the injured. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated due to dirty village politics. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and in view of the injury suffered by the victim, presently I am not inclined to grant the petitioners the privilege of bail, which is hereby rejected. 6. However, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after four months from today. HR/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T