APHC010583242008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 797/2008 Between: 1. SANAPALA RAJULAMMA,, D/O. APPA RAO, CULTIVATION /COOLI, R/O. LATCHAYYAPETA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PP ANOTHER, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD. 2. TIRLANGI RAMU, S/O. MALLAYYA, KALINGA , LATCHAYYAPETA VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Crl.RC., against the Judgment in Sessions Case No.134 of 2005 dated 31.1.2006 on the file fo the court of Sessions, Sessions Division, Srikakulam (Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Rajam), IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 1398 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 417 days in filing the Crl.RC., against the Judgment in Sessions Case No.134 of 2005 dated 31.1.2006 on the file fo the court of Sessions, Sessions Division, Srikakulam (Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Rajam), Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K PURUSHOTHAM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.797 of 2008 O R D E R: 1. On 10.12.2025, the SHO concerned was directed to submit a report regarding the status of the petitioner. 2. In terms of the direction, Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponduru Police Station submitted a report. It appears from the report that the petitioner and her family members died due to genetical disorder. As there are no surviving members of the family, it is not possible to collect the death certificate of the petitioner. 3. On perusing the report and considering the matter, it appears that the petitioner has expired. 4. Since the petitioner has already been expired, it is not necessary to proceed with this case. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Dated: 31.12.2025. SCS 4 195 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.797 of 2008 DATED: 31.12.2025. SCS