Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 53965 (BOM)
RAJESH DUBEY v. SIGNPOST INDIA PVT. LTD., NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
WP/5629/2024 · 2025-07-22
Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53965 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 53965 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 24. WP 5629 of 2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.5629/2024 Shri Rajesh Dubey ...Versus… Signpost India Pvt. Ltd. Civil Lines, Nagpur and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.P. Wachasundar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Nikhil Padhye, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 22/07/2025
1. It is informed by learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 that the complaint is decided finally. Raising challenge to decision of dismissal of complaint, revision is also presented by the petitioner. Therefore, nothing survives to be decided in this petition.
2. Needless to state that the revisional Court shall decide the revision on its own merit. All points are kept open.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) Wadkar 2025:BHC-NAG:7133