Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 53960 (PNJ)

SOHAIL TANWEER v. PUNJAB NURSES REGISTRATION COUNCIL AND OTHERS

CWP/12837/2025 · 2025-05-07

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12837-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-12837-2025 Date of Decision :07.05.2025 Sohail Tanweer ...Petitioner Versus Punjab Nurses Registration Council & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Talwinder Singh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for respondent No.1. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner appeared in the 3rd year examination of GNM (General Nursing and Midwifery) course for the session 2023-24 but he has been declared absent in the examination of Midwifery and Gynecological Nursing subject, which was conducted on 22.12.2024 whereas, the petitioner had appeared in the said examination and even photocopy of the answer sheet is also attached. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which has been raised in the present petition, has already been raised by the petitioner in the legal notice dated 28.04.2025 (Annexure P/7), which is pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied in case, a direction is issued to respondents to decide the same in a AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.12 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12837-2025 -2- time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate accepts notice of behalf of respondent No.1 and submits that in case, legal notice dated 28.04.2025 (Annexure P/7) has been received from the petitioner, the same will be decided by the respondents by passing appropriate speaking order within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted otherwise, due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed, which order will be conveyed to the petitioner for her information and necessary action. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. May 07, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.05.12 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document