Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010002722025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/145/2025 NAZIM UDDIN AND 3 ORS S/O LATE RAFIQUL HAQUE, VILL- WEST KANISHAIL, P.O.-KANISHAL, P.S. AND DIST -SRIBHUMI, ASSAM 2: QUAMRUL ISLAM S/O LATE SAMSUDDIN VILL- BETAIL (BONOMALI-2) P.O.-AMBARKHANA P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM 3: MAHBUBUR RAHMAN S/O ABDUL KARIM VILL- WEST KANISHAIL P.O.-KANISHAIL P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM 4: FARUK AHMED S/O LATE TOBARAK ALI VILL- WEST KANISHAIL P.O.-KANISHAIL P.S. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE ASSM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRIBHUMI (ASSAM) PIN-788710 5:THE DISTRICT ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER KRIMGANJ/SRIBHUMI P.O. AND DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788710 6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BADARPUR-CHAITANYANGAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GARDHARASI VILL AND P.O.-MOHAKAL SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-78870 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R CHOUDHURY, A S PRODHANI,S. TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, A S E C BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 26.06.2025 Heard Shri H.R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri K. Konwar, the learned AAG, Assam as well as Shri R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the State Election Commission. Page No.# 3/3 The challenge in this writ petition was in respect of the action taken by the District Delimitation Commission. The petitioners are aggrieved by change of their Wards. The learned counsel for the respondents have however informed that this issue along with connected issues have already been decided by this Court in a series of writ petition, the lead case being WP(C)/5346/2024, judgment dated 24.04.2025 whereby the challenge has been rejected. On perusal of the copy of the said judgment, it appears that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the said judgment. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant